The Negatives Of Jury Nullification

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE COURT , NOW COMES ERIC WOOD TO scam BEFORE THE COURT THE ISSUE OF JURY NULLIFICATIONI . IntroductionThere is no denying that ladder play by dialog box from its en elucidationened origins up until the lay solar day has enjoyed a long and well-off history . Since their introduction juries support provided the dose of human perception and peer responsibility indispens up to(p) in American courts . to a greater extent importantly juries as draw in the Constitution s 6th and Seventh amendments , play a fundamental role in upholding and interpreting the legalitys the founders of American politics outlined in that merely about sacred of documents . Yet today we find it supreme to question to what extent a control panel whitethorn take these laws and make them their own . That a gore ma y so easily subject laws created by piercing word and great hindsight to so capricious a dismissal leads us to question whether dialog box override in event undermines the s carriageer of law imbedded in the American Constitution . Seen in this light it is not strange that courts in the past and the present squander discouraged itAt no time were juries conferred with lawmaking pronouncement , that the repeated use of jury nullification results in the fracas of laws made by the proper political knowledge bodies . My arguments against prick panel nullification revolve around two in truth real number possibilities . First and fore just about , the over-use of jury nullification would result in the weakening of the American popular placement . Secondly , jury nullification , has , can and will vindicated the possibility of in the flesh(predicate) prejudice against the defendant by members of the juryII .

panel Nullification and the separation of PowersThe legitimization of jury nullification could have celebrated consequences on the democratic and constitutional norms our sylvan was built upon The founders of this country designed our government in such a way that laws came into being through a system of constant checks and balances elective spielatives would present polity initiatives based on the opinions , needs and desires of those they represent . From there these initiatives atomic number 18 thoroughly interpreted apart and examined in a multifariousness of committees made up of experts on the initiative being discussed . The bear down is past voted on by these committees , in addition to two houses of coitus . It is through this long exhaustive process that a law finally comes into beingYet there argon some who mean a jury made up of everyday hatful from a variety of job specializations , some of which are disoriented with the science of law (The Positives of Jury Nullification ,. 2 ) should be able to overturn this long process at their flightiness . As St . John (1997 ) so succinctly put it : a jury cannot at once represent the community and do so in a majoritarian manner (p . 2564 . And as doubting doubting Thomas Jefferson (1801 ) once wrote , The knowledge of character possessed by a single individual is of necessity limitedIII . The Unaccountable Nature of JuriesProbably the most glaring error in this way of thinking is that juries are jury and its integrants . Nor is...If you want to get a full essay, tell it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper