"What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?" Analysis of Frederick Douglass's speech, how did he construct his argument and did he argue effectively.

In his speech, What to the Slave is the wizard-fourth of July?, Frederick Douglass giftionately argues that to the striver, and even to the freed Afri hindquarters Ameri notify, the Fourth of July is no more than a ridicule of the grossest kind. Douglas uses numerous rhetorical strategies to convey his powerful emotions on the subject, and the end ensue is a very effectively argued exhibitedness.         Douglass begins by asking a serial of rhetorical questions, non without the use of sarcasm. He refers to that Declaration of Independence, or else of the Declaration of Independence, to sieve the separation between his people and those who atomic number 18 not oppressed. In the next paragraph, he continues to ask rhetorical questions. The purpose of all these questions is to give the audile sense the perspective that what is suggested is not truly so. He did not choose to give a speech on the pass that his people are reminded of the injustice force d upon them in ordinate to express gratitude and joy for the independence of the States, because he does not parcel in any of that joy, because he does not share in any of that independence. The third paragraph is where the line is visibly drawn for the audience. No more rhetorical questions at this orientate. The truth is fixed out; the separation is do clear. Douglass prolifically uses the terms you and me, us and them, to stress the item that this holi solar day is of a double-meaning, and for his people it is a day of mourning, while for the rest of them, it is a day of dip joy. In the text, much(prenominal) actors line are italicized, meaning that while he gave the speech, he made accredited to put emphasis on these words in a way that would be comparable to crush the pressure points of his audience (you). An interesting point green goddess be brought up at this moment: his immediate audience during the delivery of this speech in July of 1852 was comprised of whi te abolitionists. Meaning, he was addressing! the people that were technically on his side, so to speak. Douglass calls for them to argue more and denounce less... deviate more and talk less, your cause would be much more likely to come after(pg.2). He almost rubs it in their faces: that their proclaimed aspirations have not been tended to with the proper amount of exploit and attention, and that all that has been put away up to that point has failed miserably. The in a higher place quotation is comparable to saw start trying or go home. The fact that he speaks so gratingly to this particular audience wholly shows how passionately he feels for his aver people.         Back to the first page, Douglass makes a reference to the Bible. He applies his deliver situation to that of the one exposit by the quote. He is the one who advise not eat up about his people. He can not express joy, when his people express their pains. His railway line line is proved multiple times with the truthful logical system k ick ined in his speech. It can be summed up with this: (1) This spend is to rejoice for the sake of exemption and liberty. (2) My people have no exemption, have no liberty. (3) You rejoice. (4) My people mourn. (5) This holiday is a fraud to us. The reference to the mockery of it all is made oer and over again, and with much(prenominal) a simply logical description, one can not possibly argue its validity.         Douglass moves on to speak of the victimizes leave by the States, and how they have piled sky-high to the point of no return. He states that any just man who is not prejudice shall apprehension that his words are of truth. He speaks of the Constitution, he speaks of the Bible, and he speaks of God. With such credited references confirming up his parametric quantity, it would almost make a man feel like the devil to even make bold to disagree. For the last half of his speech, Douglass addresses what he should speak of, what he should argue. He go es into detail about each different aspect of there! fore African Americans have the same inherent right to freedom as do any other human beings. uneven by one, he suggests he argue about the break ones back being a man, that man be entitled to liberty, that it is unlawful to make men brutes, and finally, that slavery is not divine.

With each, he elaborates on the fact that each argument is so basic, so implicit, that it wickedness qua non not be argued. It all flows back to his own argument about the holiday on which he speaks. Freedom is the indwelling right of all men. Arguing against it is like trying to nullify a fact of science, so arguing for it is poin tless because the record is enough proof already. If a man is a man, frankincense freedom is what he is entitled to, and if this can not be seen, then arguing for it will do no good. aft(prenominal) this point is made, he makes a very powerful statement to back up this idea. For it is not light that is needed hardly shift up(pg.4). The light is the obvious- the arguments for the freedom of all men, but the onset is what is missing, what is desperately needed- the drastic awakening of America to its own crimes against humanity, and the ultimate of changing this, because it can not be undone, but it can except get worse. His words seem to flow with a heated fervency which could not be stopped. One could only when imagine actually hearing the speech when it was given by Douglass himself. It would make sense to compare him to a preacher, up at the podium, speaking out against the devil and his ways with fire and brimstone. His point is not made, but forced, upon the audience .         Douglass ends his amazing spe! ech with the statement that he has been working to prove all along: The Fourth of July is a disgusting reminder to him and his people of the ongoing cruelty that America attempts to put a veil over with this mockery. While the cheat rejoice, the oppressed are driven further into sadness. His speech is a calling, a calling for change. Change is all that America has to bespeak for, Douglass argues, for the obscenities of the past can not be undone, and the horror of the accede must not go on. He calls for a land out to the damage, and for the exposure of the perpetrator: America. If you want to get a dependable essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper