Would Juluis caesar be a good king

Would Julius Caesar be a tidy king? Julius Caesar takes place in ancient capital of Italy in 44 B. C. He was never technically king, scarcely he came close up to having the powers of a king, but he got killed before he could become one. He is very supreme throughout the story while he is unflurried alive. He is pretty stubborn while existence p retty manipulative Just like almost every character in the play. I dont feel like he will be a good king just because of his presumption. He also had his good qualities like being a military astermind.Caesar utters us his arrogance throughout the play. For example in Act 1 Scene 2 he says Such custody as he be never at hearts ease Whiles they observe a greater than themselves, and therefore are they very dangerous. I quite tell thee what is to be feard than what I fear, for always I am Caesar . In this quote we can see that is Caesar unashamed of how arrogant he is being. This arrogance would cause him to do other errors like he did later in the story like ignoring his wifes dreamHe was great ruler because he led Rome in the right direction, but by doing so, in the process he was an arrogant and selfish ruler. He was great for Rome as a ruler but not for the people. Just like Brutus said in Act 2 Scene 1 And therefore deem him as a serpents egg which, natchd, would, as his kind, grow mischievous, and ill shell. Here Brutus is comparison Caesar to a Serpents Egg that is should be destroyed before it hatches and becomes dangerous if he becomes king.They are not afraid of him ecause he is a tyrant but will become one if he becomes the king of Rome. In the handwriting Julius Caesar manipulation seems like a varsity sport. In Act 2 Scene 1 Caesar really deceives the Romans. He is putting a show and refusing that he doesnt want the crown, even though he would secretly cope it deep inside. He thinks that refusal to the crown in front of the public is a smart political tactic to get people to love him and think h e less ambitious or for lack of better denomination desperate.This is also a form of reverse hycology as Caesar is using it to start the crowd like him and even consider making him king as he is not greedy and hungry for it. In conclusion Caesar would be a great king for Rome but not for the Romans. He is a genius in warfare but is very arrogant which cost him his life. If he was king his arrogance would definitely be his downfall. And the romans would abide by out that he was manipulating them, it was Just a matter of time. He would be a very good war chief of be a ruler with Pompey but not a king all by himself.