Comparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert Bridges’ Poem EPÙà and An

Comparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert bridge over Poem EP and Anne Stevensons Poem concupiscence It is oftenin books, metrical compositions, paintings, and sculpturesthat unrivalled hears of and sees the deitydess of honey. But when is it that one hears of the graven image? In Hellenic mythology, concupiscence is the idol of love, and a god who is many times overlooked. In Robert bridge over EP and Anne Stevensons sexual desire, the idea that Eros is overlooked is portrayed, nevertheless in devil separate ways. Techniques such as diction, forecastry, and tone atomic number 18 employ to second convey the idea.EP, Greek for Eros, is shown to be better-looking in tie poem beautiful and adored, nonwithstanding forgotten. Eros is veneratedcalled idol, and he plagues the emotional state as a tyrant. He is a flower of lovely youth, and an image of lasting truth. Through these strong talking to, Eros is portrayed to be the god that muckle all look up to in adm iration for his probable keep and ideal bang. Eros is so striking that only the famed Pheidias, the Greek Sculptor, can compare through his marmoreal works. Greek sculptors strove for apotheosis and this Eros wasperfection. Although giving thought and love to others, he received no(prenominal) back, yet continued his job without complaint. People recognize the youth and beauty of love with the vivid images that Bridges uses. With thy exuberant flesh so fair, wad are able to see Eross outward beauty. At that instantaneous moment, people are enthralled by Eros splendor, exclusively formerly they are satisfied, they forget, and their momentary enchantment disappears. None who eer yend for thy embrace, Hath cared to look upon thy face. All those who yearned for love, received it, but once having do so, neglected to see and look upon Eros. By using these beautiful words and... ... for lust, but he would rather take the effects of it being beaten(a) and hurtthen cave in and s upport not love, but lust. Eros was made into a dilapidated, worn out god by the people who used him. He is the archetypes that you create, and thus shown to be an hateful and ugly god due to peoples demands for lust. In two poems, Eros is misunderstood and forgotten. The proper respects for the one who grants love, and thus felicitousness is not given. Through the different uses of diction and imagery, different tones were established in the cardinal poems. In Bridges EP, Eros is shown to be the forgotten beauty, and in Stevensons Eros, Eros is portrayed as the broken, tired, and misunderstood god. Contrasting, yet similar, both poems depict Eros, the god of love, as a neglected god, often conclusion himself in situations where improper respects were paid. Comparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert Bridges Poem EP and AnComparing the Forgotten God of Love in Robert Bridges Poem EP and Anne Stevensons Poem Eros It is oftenin books, poems, paintings, and scul pturesthat one hears of and sees the goddess of love. But when is it that one hears of the god? In Greek mythology, Eros is the god of love, and a god who is many times overlooked. In Robert Bridges EP and Anne Stevensons Eros, the idea that Eros is overlooked is portrayed, but in two separate ways. Techniques such as diction, imagery, and tone are used to help convey the idea.EP, Greek for Eros, is shown to be beautiful in Bridges poem beautiful and adored, yet forgotten. Eros is veneratedcalled idol, and he plagues the heart as a tyrant. He is a flower of lovely youth, and an image of eternal truth. Through these strong words, Eros is portrayed to be the god that people all look up to in admiration for his credible honor and ideal beauty. Eros is so striking that only the famous Pheidias, the Greek Sculptor, can compare through his marmoreal works. Greek sculptors strove for perfection and this Eros wasperfection. Although giving thought and love to others, he received none back, yet continued his job without complaint. People recognize the youth and beauty of love with the vivid images that Bridges uses. With thy exuberant flesh so fair, people are able to see Eross outward beauty. At that instantaneous moment, people are enthralled by Eros splendor, but once they are satisfied, they forget, and their momentary enchantment disappears. None who eer longd for thy embrace, Hath cared to look upon thy face. All those who yearned for love, received it, but once having done so, neglected to see and look upon Eros. By using these beautiful words and... ... for lust, but he would rather take the effects of itbeing beaten and hurtthen cave in and support not love, but lust. Eros was made into a dilapidated, worn out god by the people who used him. He is the archetypes that you create, and thus shown to be an undesirable and unsightly god due to peoples demands for lust. In both poems, Eros is misunderstood and forgotten. The proper respects for the one who grants l ove, and thus happiness is not given. Through the different uses of diction and imagery, different tones were established in the two poems. In Bridges EP, Eros is shown to be the forgotten beauty, and in Stevensons Eros, Eros is portrayed as the broken, tired, and misunderstood god. Contrasting, yet similar, both poems depicted Eros, the god of love, as a neglected god, often finding himself in situations where improper respects were paid.